Loading the weekly comparison...
Loading the current release...
The week
at a glance.
Loading the clearest summary...
i
Loading the coverage calculation.
Loading the novelty calculation.
Coverage items are source pages. Developments are real-world occurrences after pages about the same thing are grouped together.
Primary relationship lens
Who gained and who was constrained?
i
AIEO first evaluates the people side and the AI or operator side. The four percentages use only developments with evidence for both sides.
One-sided, no-clear, ambiguous, and insufficient cases remain outside the four-pattern denominator.
AI side gains, people are constrained
AI-benefiting parasitismPeople gain, AI side is constrained
Human-benefiting parasitismBoth are constrained
Competition or co-constraintSource-linked evidence
Open the developments behind the signal
i
Seen before means the development appears in this week’s coverage and also appeared in AIEO’s earlier evidence pool. It is not an all-time archive filter.
Publication history
Latest week compared with the week before
i
The launch reference overlaps the first standardized Monday-to-Sunday week. It is preserved as a reference, but it is not connected as a normal week-to-week point.
Green and red arrows show direction versus the previous standardized week. They do not mean good or bad.
Open the full standardized weekly history
Secondary human lens
What changed for people?
i
The index runs from -100 to +100. Negative values mean more constraining effects among scored developments. Positive values mean more enabling effects. Zero means balance or no direct change.
Unclear cases are excluded from the index and shown separately.
Method in one line